scientific journal publication ethicsmexican restaurant wiesbaden

This reader was not dissuaded by any argument. In research paper there should be sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work if desired. Although some Science Journals are multidisciplinary, most journals are highly specialized and they publish articles related to specific scientific fields. Journal of Medical Ethics. Redundant publication is sometimes equated to duplicate publication. How would you have handled the situation if you were the senior author? If the animal or human subjects have been involved to conduct research work, the author should ensure that all procedures were carried out in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. If the same data were counted twice (or more), the outcomes of meta-analysis used to establish the best practice would be invalid. There were three authors: the first author was a postdoctoral fellow working with the senior (third) author, and the second author was a technician in the same laboratory. What are the scientific benefits of republishing data? Redundant publications in surgery: a threat to patient safety? Aside from the obvious attempt to inflate one’s own publication record, duplication (and redundant) publication has the potential to skew the evidence base (65). 2, 1 June 2007 | Advances in Physiology Education, Vol. Elsevier's Ethics Toolkit contains introductory materials to help you get started, and you can visit the Ethics in Research & Publication website at ethics.elsevier.com and download the files mentioned in this Toolkit. Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update . In spite of this universally accepted criterion, double submission still occurs and continues to be a real problem for scientific journals. Duplicate publication is defined as the publication of an article that is identical or overlaps substantially with an article already published elsewhere, with or without acknowledgment (11, 36). It is the right and responsibility of all parties, authors and reviewers alike, to report suspected and actual ethical infractions and concerns to the editor. 4B). The authors complied with this request. Vigilance over the Published Record:The editor is responsible to safeguard the integrity of the published record by reviewing and assessing the reported or suspected misconduct regarding research, publication, reviewer and editorial along with the publisher.The editor is also responsible to take such measures as contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration to the respective complaint or claims made. (18) wrote a concise summary of conflict of interest policies for clinical journals. Academic Journal: Editing and Publishing: Launch One Your Own In scientific research and publishing, maintaining objectivity is vital to uphold public confidence in the integrity of the research process and the reputation of the home institution and journal (54). Although I do not pretend to know the identity of the referees, I feel justified to seek an answer to this question.” On examination, the editor discovers that yes; indeed, one of the authors of the previously published paper was one of the three reviewers of the manuscript in question. Of the aims set forth by the commission, one in particular was to outline the essential ethical principles on which research involving human subjects should be based. As long as people are doing science, people rightfully desire credit for their efforts. 14, No. The most recent revision took place in 2000, with amendments being made in 2002 and 2004 that further clarified language used within the Declaration to focus its intentions. Publication Ethics | Research | Science Partner Journal Each case is followed by a series of discussion questions. 2, 26 January 2021 | Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. Author contributions to ecological publications: What does it mean to be an author in modern ecological research? 2, 6 September 2017 | Publishing Research Quarterly, Vol. Even a perception of bias can be just as damaging as the real thing. Regarding the Treatment of Humans and Animals. We surveyed journal editors to determine their views about a range of publication ethics issues. In the Methods section, the authors stated that livers from 30 bears were used, and the bears were purchased from licensed trappers who hunted them for the fur. Federal regulations may have the force of law and can be enforced by the government agencies but are not laws themselves. The final decision regarding the ultimate disposition of a manuscript rests with the editor, not the reviewers (70). What should be done? Would it be permissible to republish data if new experiments were added (under the identical conditions) in the second manuscript? Publishing Ethics for Editors - Elsevier.com Before 1986, the funding agencies themselves (or, in the case of NIH, the individual institutes) were responsible for performing the regulatory functions established by the aforementioned CFR. Should the reviewer inform the editor of a conflict of interest? Ethics of Scientific publication - SlideShare

The main strength of this book is that it examines the challenges facing the field of Bioethics today from medical, ethical and legal perspectives. Publication Ethics: Giving Credit where Credit is Due ... Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst (The ...

• Methods and procedures adopted during […] The graduate student, who was unaware that she was the author of the manuscript on the desk, stated that as part of the laboratory’s Journal Club they do group reviews of manuscripts that the senior investigator has been asked to review. It is prima facie evidence for the . He is expected to keep privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review confidential. They also specifically state that “…[e]ach author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content…” (36). We emphasize that they are aberrations: by far and away, the vast majority of scientists and science is pure and true. See Complete List Of Journals.

Using plagiarism detection software to uncover matching text across disciplines, Assessing formal teaching of ethics in physiology: an empirical survey, patterns, and recommendations, Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies, Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine, Publications in Psychiatry: How to Do and What to Do, The past, present and future of African herpetology, Authorship and Publication Practices in the Social Sciences: Historical Reflections on Current Practices, Ethical and Legal Issues in Publication and Dissemination of Scholarly Knowledge: A Summary of the Published Evidence, Research Ethics III: Publication Practices and Authorship, Conflicts of Interest, and Research Misconduct, Research Ethics I: Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)—Historical and Contemporary Issues Pertaining to Human and Animal Experimentation, Governing Knowledge in the Scientific Community: Exploring the Role of Retractions in Biomedicine, From Abstract to Publication: The Fate of Research Presented at an Annual Forensic Meeting, Analysis of Citations to Biomedical Articles Affected by Scientific Misconduct, A Framework Is Required to Reduce Publication Bias The Academic Surgeon's View, Author-overdose. One person is designated as the “guarantor” of the article, i.e., the person accountable for the veracity of the data and the ethical conduct of all aspects of the work. Such practice is considered unethical and unacceptable. Introduction of Research Methods and Publication Ethics Impact Factor: 2.916 Citescore: 4.0 All metrics >> Civility & Misconduct Allegations: Editor(s), Reviewer(s), Author(s) and the Journal staff are relied upon to stick to the essential expert civility. It is our hope that by increasing education and awareness of ethical matters relevant to scientific investigation and publication, deviations from appropriate conduct will be reduced. It also publishes academic books and conference proceedings. Found inside – Page 195Lancet. 2015;386:2447–9. 2. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) [Internet]. [cited 2016 Aug 6]; Available from: http://publicationethics.org/resources/ 3. Babalola O, Grant-Kels JM, Parish LC. Ethical dilemmas in journal publication. Publication ethics Roger Watson Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Advanced Nursing Editor, Nursing Open 2. 6, No. It is also found in the United States Code (USC), Title 7, Sections 2131 to 2156. Published statement? Council of Science Editors, CSE's White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012, 3.4 Digital Images and Misconduct Authorship will remain an integral part of the science career, as well it should. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement Journal IJSMR is a peer-reviewed electronic international journal. The vagueness of authorship criteria and the common practice of honorary or guest authorship (i.e., lists of noncontributing persons as authors simply for political or personal reasons) has led Drummond Rennie, Deputy Editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), to say: “There is abundant evidence that the concept of authorship, when applied to co-investigators in biomedical research, is inadequate and the system is truly broken” (66). Over this time span, on average 30 new cases per year were opened. The notice is cited in PubMed, which can have serious impact on the reputation of the author(s) (36). Our journals are essential to fulfilling the AAAS mission to 'advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all people.'

Importantly, the regulations outlined in the CFR have no effect on any local, state, or foreign laws or guidelines established to provide further protection of human subjects in scientific research (80). First, it may infringe international copyright law. All extramural institutions requesting federal PHS funding must provide training in the responsible conduct of research to employees, faculty, students, and postdoctoral students (39). Exemptions from this policy are those that can be seen as the least physically and psychologically invasive of studies conducted on human subjects. Disputes and personality conflicts can arise during an investigation that may cause discord and disagreement over who qualifies for authorship. The editor should seek further opinions if needed.In the selection of reviewers, the editor must ensure suitable expertise in the relevant field and must follow best practice to avoid the selection of fraudulent peer reviewers. The review process was quite extensive, the paper having undergone several rounds of peer review. The author’s work is taken very seriously, and the editor always has the final decision. To maintain the readers' trust and to uphold the journal's reputation, it is paramount for the entire research, peer reviewer and publication process to follow ethical principles and decisions. 6, 21 July 2015 | Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. When a large, multicenter group is involved, as is increasingly the case, then the ICMJE suggests that all the individuals involved meet the criteria for authorship, but that the group designates certain individuals that are responsible for the work as a whole.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication:An author should avoid going for multiple, redundant and concurrent publication. Scientific Research Publishing is an academic publisher with more than 200 open access journal in the areas of science, technology and medicine. Why do ethical issues arise?

Publication of scientific paper is critical for modern science evolution, and professional advancement. Plagiarism:Plagiarism in its all forms including, from ‘passing off’ another’s paper as the author’s own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another’s paper to claiming results from others’ research is altogether unethical and unacceptable. According to the editor, an investigator is supposed to use a surrogate end point to identify animals that are terminal, but before they become moribund. 12, No. All human subject protocols, including the actual informed consent document, must be reviewed and approved by a duly established Institutional Review Board (IRB). Such articles will be rejected immediately. He/she continued to write, demanding that “…an honest disclosure of competing financial interest…” of the authors be acknowledged in print. If the explanations given are acceptable, what actions, if any, should be taken against the author? Publication Ethics. The use or exclusion of one population over another must be accompanied by proper reasoning and be agreed on by the investigator’s IRB. Publication Ethics promotes and encourages developing high quality scientific contents during publication process. Publishing Ethics | Scientific.Net Basically, both papers examined mechanisms of apoptosis in isolated cells and reached the same conclusions as to mechanism. Any verbal manhandle, level headed discussions and affront is exceptionally offended by ARC Publications. All Rights Reserved. Publication Ethics. In this way, the sanctity of the process can be preserved, and authors can be spared much anguish. When all necessary information is provided and the subject understands the benefits and drawbacks of the study, it becomes the subject’s responsibility whether or not to give voluntary consent. The only comment made was to remove one figure. Investigators are thereby charged with making efforts to secure the well-being of research subjects. There are a number of different computer programs available to detect commonality of language between different written works (see Ref. 50, No.

The author should disclose all sources of financial support for the conduction of the research and/or preparation of the article, as well as the role of the sponsor(s), if any, in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. According to the disgruntled author, after the paper was accepted, the lead author made himself (a postdoctoral fellow) the corresponding author without informing the other two authors. If the editor or the publisher learn from a third party about an error or inaccuracy in the published work, it is obligatory for author to cooperate with the editor, including providing evidence to the editor where requested. Breaking the publishing ethics rules can badly damage your reputation as a researcher, and even spell the end of your career. As scheduled to be a member of The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), publication ethics and publication malpractice statement of International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies is completely based on the Code of Conduct and Best-Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors (Committee on Publication . GSJ on Facebook . What should be done? The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), a recognized organization on ethical issues pertaining to the biomedical research community, defines authorship in the following way: “Authorship credit should be based on: 1) substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and 3) final approval of the version to be published. It had a single author from a country other than the United States. The editor may share limited information with editors of other journals where deemed necessary to investigate suspected research misconduct and he may also consult with the publisher in extreme cases. He/she should also be responsible for all communication regarding the manuscript (with the journal and reviewers). If the editor was not aware of the violations and the article has already been published, then a notice of duplicate publication will be published with or without the author’s explanation or approval. COPE Committee on Publication Ethics. Global Journal of Food Science. In evaluating the submitted works, the editors should limit themselves only to the intellectual content. Promote Industry Best Practice:We are committed to promoting the best practice by offering editors publication ethics advised by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and providing them with Similarity Check reports for all submissions to our editorial systems. It is important to emphasize that this number still represents only a small fraction of the total number of manuscripts that flow through the system. Should these apply to all the authors or just the one who is the author of the current submission? Found insideJournal policy on ethics in scientific publication. Ann Emerg Med 2003; ... Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. ... AMWA position statement on the contributions of medical writers to scientific publications. Committee, journal editors, members of a publication committee or research ethics committee, etc. Publication Ethics. B: percentage of the total number of published articles in the American Journal of Physiology-Consolidated (AJP), Journal of Applied Physiology (JAP), and Journal of Neurophysiology (JN) authored by either one (▴) or two (▪) persons from 1960–2004. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer, and the publisher IJSMR. Redundant publications duplicate and overlapping publications, salami slicing. There is, therefore, the expectation that the work be conducted and reported honestly, objectively, and fairly. Regulations can only be developed by agencies if laws permit them to do so, i.e., there is an enabling statute. Publication Ethics Statement SCIRP is committed to maintaining high standards through a rigorous peer-review together with strict ethical policies. 1, 25 November 2014 | Revista española de Documentación Científica, Vol. Some of the suggestions that have been made include teaching scientists about the importance of authorship and about the weight it carries. When contacted, the author produced a copy of a newly revised version of that book chapter in which he is now included as a third author. The editor must hide reviewers’ identities unless the journal is operating in an open peer review system or the reviewers agree to unfold their identities The editor cannot use unpublished material of the submitted articles for his own research without the express written consent of the author.

2, 8 October 2018 | Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, Vol. In the end, it still falls on the shoulders of those conducting human research to exhibit integrity, dignity, and justice to ensure that proper care is given to all who offer themselves to advance our understanding of the disease process. It is imperative for all of us to be aware of potentially compromising ethical situations, and to continue our own education in proper experimental techniques and publication practices. With the availability of computerized medical databases, including databases of dissertations, scientific proceedings, and research articles, such as PubMed or HighWire Press, it becomes much more difficult for authors to duplicate previously published work (1). Could the journal publish the manuscript without the technician signing the Change of Authorship form? In 1981, the regulations outlined by the Belmont Report were added to the CFR at Title 45, Part 46 (76). Second, if left undiscovered, it could waste other researcher’s time and energies attempting to replicate or build on the data presented in a falsified paper. How might plagiarism or even appearances of plagiarism jeopardize the reputation of an author or authors? Not only does being an author signify a personal contribution to knowledge thus imparting respect and pride, but it is also used as a measure for promotions and tenure. Publication Ethics. The editor processes the withdrawal after investigating the matter. Article Sharing, Article Withdrawal, Article Retraction, Article Removal and Article Replacement. Fig. Publication Decision:The decisions regarding the publication of an article are solely and independently taken by the editor of the concerned journal. The book chapter was not referenced in the review article. We discuss ethical issues that can arise because of conflict of interest, author conflicts, and human experimentation. If the parties are judged guilty of scientific misconduct by the investigation committee, then adjudication occurs, usually by a high-ranking university official such as the provost or president, during which recommendations are reviewed and appropriate corrective or punitive actions determined (56). Peer Review:The editor is responsible to ensure fair, unbiased, and timely review process. The journal editor rejects the manuscript for other reasons, but fails to mention in his cover letter to the manuscript author the alleged plagiarism. On returning to her own laboratory, she telephoned the editor with the complaint that her manuscript was circulated among her research competitors at another university. In this work the authors isolated a protein from the livers of black bears. It is this amalgam of credit and responsibility that forms the precious foundation for the esteemed moniker of “author.”. Contribution to Editorial Decisions:Peer review is an important component of formal scholarly communication and lies at the heart of the scientific method. 4, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Vol. The collection of materials of the international scientific conference "Actual problems of applied sciences" is the most modern survey articles of internationally recognized authorities. All articles are CC-BY licensed. Conferences. The work including animal models and human volunteers need to submit the essential proclamations. The publication of scientific research in peer-reviewed journals is essential for scientific progress since it enables the dissemination of research results (which represent an investment of time and money) for others in the research community to build on. 33, No. Documented approval by an IRB, IACUC, or equivalent oversight committee is also a requirement for publication. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the research paper. It was sent to two peer reviewers, both of whom recommend acceptance. The journal would then suggest the best approach. 1 of Ref.

Clearance Swimming Pools, El Jefe Food Truck Menu Maryland, Javascript Read Barcode From Camera, What Is Going On With Delta Airlines Today, Kate Spade Backpack Nylon, American Airlines Route Map 2021,